Transparencia radical: ¿buscamos el equilibrio?
Si ayer hablábamos de transparencia en la gestión, vienen perfectas un par de entradas de Chris Anderson respecto al concepto de transparencia radical en que anda inmersa la revista “Wired”. Habla el papel de los editores como “curadores y catalizadores” de conversaciones, que se producen dentro y fuera del entorno de la revista. THEN: Media as Lecture: we create content, you read it. NOW: Media as Conversation: a total blur between traditional journalism, blogging and user comment/contributions. THEN: Readers read HTML in a standard web browser window. If you want to be really fancy, design a whole new Flash interface that people will have to learn to get to your content. Charge for “premium content”? Sure! NOW: More and more people read via RSS, where content is divorced from context. Media is atomized and microchunked. Even if readers do come to your site, the expectation is that the presentation will be a mix of HTML, AJAX, Flash multimedia and embedded third-party apps. Screens range from high-resolution wide displays to handhelds. Whatever you do, don’t let your design interfere with web conventions–everything must be Google-crawlable and blogger permalinkable. Oh, and everything must be open and free. THEN: We control the site. […]